According to the discussion in the Scala thread, the release cycles would
stay unchanged and are still part of the mxnet releases.

Nan Zhu <zhunanmcg...@gmail.com> schrieb am Mo., 12. März 2018, 17:42:

> how about release cycle?
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 9:37 AM, Yuan Tang <terrytangy...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 12:35 PM, Marco de Abreu <
> > marco.g.ab...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Tianqi Chen <tqc...@cs.washington.edu> schrieb am Mo., 12. März 2018,
> > > 17:33:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 9:32 AM, Chris Olivier <
> cjolivie...@apache.org
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > It has been proposed that all Non-C API's follow separate
> versioning
> > > from
> > > > > the main mxnet C API/releases.
> > > > >
> > > > > A +1 vote is in *favor of* using a different versioning for all
> > > > > non-C-API's, with each API (Scala, R, Julia, C++, etc.) having its
> > own
> > > > > version.
> > > > >
> > > > > A -1 vote is *against* using a different versioning for all
> > > non-C-API's,
> > > > > with all API's (Scala, R, Julia, C++, etc.) sharing the mxnet
> > version.
> > > > >
> > > > > This vote will conclude on Monday, March 19, 2018.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > -Chris
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to