I've improved the document based on recent comments, please have another look. What has been changed so far:
* Fixed unclear formulations * Added details about the current state of the library and why is it complicated to use * Improved the explanation of the piml idiom and provided a code example * Added thread safety requirements Thanks @chris and @naveen for your reviewing efforts! 2018-03-14 21:44 GMT+01:00 Anton Chernov <[email protected]>: > Sure, here we go: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Xi0aU9Nks7- > GcsJIfcXoEpgPeYnSiEtBpJlhZvMaIb8/edit?usp=sharing > > > 2018-03-14 19:15 GMT+01:00 Chris Olivier <[email protected]>: > >> Can you put that on google docs so that it can be commented/edited? >> >> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:07 AM, Anton Chernov <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > Dear MxNet Community, >> > >> > please find here >> > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action? >> pageId=75976112> >> > the >> > design document for the proposed MXNet C++ package improvements for >> review >> > and consideration. >> > >> > Feedback is welcome and highly appreciated. Thank you! >> > >> > BR >> > Anton >> > >> > >
