Tomorrow I am going to nuke pre-Kepler support. Speak now or forever hold your peace.
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 10:08 AM Anirudh <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 cudnn doesn't support this either. > > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018, 2:03 AM kellen sunderland < > [email protected]> > wrote: > > > I doubt practically speaking that many pre-Keplar devices would be that > > useful for MXNet anyway. +1 to dropping them and making our codebase > more > > readable / maintainable. > > > > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 12:23 AM, Marco de Abreu < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Definitely in favour of dropping support! > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 12:22 AM, Chris Olivier <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Cuda9 nvcc no longer supports Fermi (pre-Kepler) architectures (2.0, > > 2.1) > > > > It appears that neither TensorFlow or PyTorch support Fermi. > > > > > > > > Are there any objections (with justification) to continue support for > > > Fermi > > > > (20, 21)? > > > > > > > > > >
