Thats an interesting suggestion. I understand the benefits, but this will
complicate things if we want to do another quick release like the previous
one (for eg. if there is a license issue because of which the release is
cancelled).

Anirudh

On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 9:23 PM, Naveen Swamy <[email protected]> wrote:

> why don't we cherry-pick and push it to the branch as well ? next time a
> release is cut from that branch we'll have everything working.
>
> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 9:21 PM, Anirudh <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Correction : This fix went into master but not 1.2 release.
> >
> > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 9:21 PM, Anirudh <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Xinyu,
> > >
> > > Thank you! This fix didnt went into master but not 1.2 release.
> > >
> > > Anirudh
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 5:23 PM, Chen, Xinyu1 <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> Regarding to the following knowing issues listed below RC3:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>   *   CMake build ignores the USE_MKLDNN flag and doesn't build with
> > >> MKLDNN support even with -DUSE_MKLDNN=1. To workaround the issue
> please
> > >> see: #10801<https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/10801>.
> > >> I think this problem has already been fixed in #10629<
> > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/10629> and we can use
> > >> CMake to build MXNet with MKLDNN support on WIN32 platform now.
> > >> Xinyu
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to