Marek, Can you add more details on your proposal? (Implementation details, operator coverage, test coverage planned)
I am aware of similar work done by other contributors (Roshani, Rajan and Anirudh) - how is this going to align? Should you guys work together? Hagay On Mon, May 21, 2018, 11:17 Marek Kolodziej <[email protected]> wrote: > def mxnet.contrib.onnx._export.export_model( sym, params, input_shape, > output): > """ > Exports a given MXNet symbol object file or path to saved file to ONNX > model file. > Input Parameters - > ---------- > sym - > A str object (path to json file) or mxnet symbol object or > checkpointed mxnet symbol object > params - > A str object (path to params file) or dict object containing the > model params > input_shape - > list of tuple object , specifies the shape of each input to the > model > output - > path to the output file, including the filename. Default: current > path , filename: model.onnx > > Return Type – > ---------- > onnx_model_path - > str object , path to saved .onnx file. > """ > ... > return onnx_model_path >
