Thanks Aaron for this quick preview. Version is selected at the top level documentation? Should we show how to install v1.0 when the user is viewing v1.2 docs?
>From UX functionality perspective - MXNet installation page is similar to PyTorch? Collection of choices to make. Behind the scenes, one single monolithic markdown is a severe problem as rightly pointed out. Aaron, can you please include more details on how this issue is planned to be handled? Another issue we need to list down is - We cannot hyperlink to specific choices in the install guide. For example, Hyperlink that takes directly to Ubuntu, GPU, Source build. This might be helpful in search engine, blogs, and documentation. Best, Sandeep On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Naveen Swamy <[email protected]> wrote: > MXNet UI definitely needs more love. > > +1 - pytorch style > +0.5 - caffe2 > > > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 11:48 AM, Markham, Aaron <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > In addition to the options on the wiki (pros & cons), there's this > preview. > > It uses a dropdown next to the install options to make it clearer what > > versions you can install… then updates the pip commands… > > > > http://54.210.6.225/install/index.html# > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > On 5/16/18, 9:31 AM, "Aaron Markham" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > I've written some notes on the wiki about issues with the > installation > > page > > along with some suggestions. I'd appreciate your feedback here or on > > the > > wiki. > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/ > Installation+page+UX > > > > Cheers, > > Aaron > > > > > > > -- Sandeep Krishnamurthy
