Hi Steffen,
It's a good meetup and it's pity I missed to join.
Regarding the proposal of 1.3, we (Intel team) want to add two items into the
list.
Please help take a review:
1) fused RNN operators for CPU (GRU/LSTM/vRNN)
Lead contributor : Patric Zhao (https://github.com/pengzhao-intel/), Lv Tao
(https://github.com/TaoLv)
Design Proposal,
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Fused+RNN+Operators+for+CPU
BTW, LSTM is already merged, GRU is under the review.
2) distributed training by MPI AllReduce
Lead contributor : Patric Zhao (https://github.com/pengzhao-intel/), Ye
zhouhai (https://github.com/threeleafzerg)
Design Proposal,
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Extend+MXNet+Distributed+Training+by+MPI+AllReduce
BTW, we enabled the distributed training for awslabs/sockeye and the PR
will be submitted soon.
Discussion in here (https://github.com/awslabs/sockeye/issues/397)
Feel free to let me know for any feedback and suggestions :)
BR,
--Patric
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steffen Rochel [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2018 1:17 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: summary of 5/29 v1.2 post mortem & next release brainstorming call
>
> Thanks to everybody who attended the MXNet post mortem and release
> brainstorm call yesterday. We had 15 callers for the morning session and 3
> people in a room in the afternoon session.
>
> Summary of the post mortem is captured here
> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Release+Retrospective+
> Apache+MXNet+v1.2.0>.
> Please feel free to add and comment.
> Lots of good suggestions how to improve our CI process. Please contribute to
> the suggested improvements.
>
> Proposal for the next release content and schedule is summarized here
> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Project+Proposals+for+n
> ext+MXNet+Release>.
> Please review, refine and add links to design specs where needed.
> Taliesin from Wolfram Design offered to share experience writing good tests
> covering different data types and I think we all could learn from it and
> improve
> the flaky tests. I will coordinate with Taliesin to setup a session.
>
>
> Q&A from the call:
>
> - Taliesin: support for control flow, discuss on dev@, avoid unrolling
> of operators, enable reshaping of operators, PR was rejected, provide more
> details
> - https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/8949
> - Anton: need to refine process for patch release (i.e. refinement of
> Release
> Versioning and Branching
>
> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Release+Versioning+and
> +Branching>
> )
> - how and who decides about patch release
> - monthly call: yes (Haibin, Anton, Wolfram Research)
>
>
> I summarized the calls as well here
> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Meetups+and+Hangout
> s> and will follow up with the suggestions.
>
> Please provide feedback on preferred monthly call times, so we can minimize
> inconvenience while maximizing possible attendance. Please leave feedback at
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Meetups+and+Hangouts
> or reply.
>
> Time planer:
> https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?iso=20180530&;
> p2=283&p3=176&p4=37&p5=179&p6=33
> Proposal
> UTC 0
> 1
> 2
> 3
> 4
> 5
> 6
> 7
> 8
> 9
> 10
> 11
> 12
> 13
> 14
> 15
> 16
> 17
> 18
> 19
> 20
> 21
> 22
> 23
> Vote count (add name or X)
> A
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> X
>
>
>
>
>
>
> B
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> X
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> C
>
>
>
> X
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> D
>
>
> X
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> add as needed
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Steffen
