Thanks everyone for chiming in and clarifying. It seems that the "C++" label name is confusing for our community since it can be interpreted as both the CPP API and the backend... As an anecdote, this issue [1 <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/10937>] is labeled as "C++" but is about the CPP API, not the backend.
Should we just rename "C++" to "Backend" to avoid confusion? [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/10937 On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:39 PM Pedro Larroy <[email protected]> wrote: > Agree with Anirudh, they are different things. Maybe change the "C++" label > to "backend" would be more informative? > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:11 PM Anirudh <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Hagay, > > > > I think we should keep these two labels seperate since they mean > different > > things. > > The C++ label refers to the issue for MXNet backend and the CPP package > > refers to the CPP language binding for mxnet. > > We can still make C++ API great again irrespective by filtering out CPP > > package issues :). > > > > Anirudh > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Hagay Lupesko <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Hey community, > > > > > > I was going over the open GitHub issues for MXNet, and noticed that we > > have > > > two labels for the CPP API: "CPP package", "C++" > > > > > > Wanted to suggest we remove "CPP package" and just stick to "C++" > > > This will make it easier for the community to classify issues and focus > > on > > > making the C++ API great again ;) > > > > > > Let me know if someone has any concerns, otherwise I will find a > > committer > > > that I can work with to make this change. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > Hagay > > > > > >
