On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 02:39:22PM -0700, Mu Li wrote: > > Going through the hosted subdomains that seems not quite correct (or the > > content hosted is not entirely correct): > > > > "Welcome to the MxNet discussion forum." Is what I get as a greeting > > navigating to discuss.mxnet.io
Am I right with assuming that this is pending evaluation wrt. to capability to attract new committers and if found useful, something that likely the PMC as a whole would want control over? > "This site faciliates data sharing for the MXNet project" is what I get > > navigating to data.mxnet.io > > This site is deprecated (created before mxnet went to apache), we still > kept it alive because some old codes may need data from it. ACK. > > https://gluon-nlp.mxnet.io/ looks like something you describe. Not sure > > who exactly is behind it in a legal sense (maybe this helps with > > understanding where my confusion/worry I coming from for it: > > https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/success-at-apache-the-apache1 ) > > > gluon-nlp and gluon-cv are two packaged based on gluon. It's still on early > developing, we are considering to either donote them to apache or merge > into mxnet when they are in a more mature sitation. At the same time, we > are consualting lawyers for the trademark issue, e.g. if gluon is a > trade-mark owned by Apache. Meh for the legal hurdles. As for my personal opinion: While a lot of projects come to Apache through the incubator, I find it easier if projects are pulled in rather earlier than later. Especially if you are thinking about merging that into mxnet it sounds like it would make an aweful lot of sense to keep the Apache mxnet project in the loop early on. > > https://zh.mxnet.io ... From what little I understand this looks like > > some Apache mxnet blog in Chinese? > > > > It's a placeholder for the Chinese translated mxnet documents. Currently > it's just a simple index page. I know that at least httpd has their docs hosted on their main web page in multiple languages. Translating docs can be a very low barrier entry for new contributors. Instead of hosting that on an external site, I think it would make sense to pull that into the main docs. > > What I find confusing as well is that at least some of the content looks > > like it might be official project content (it's even linked to from > > official project docs), except it seems like it's not controlled by the > > project? <- is that assumption correct? Isabel
