No worries! I think we’ll stick with this version for the time being since we haven’t had issues with it. Building from source is a non-starter since this is part of an automated docker build for us and we don’t want all the build-dependencies.
Thanks for looking into this! On August 31, 2018 at 2:37:20 PM, Anton Chernov ([email protected]) wrote: Thank you for noticing! We are working on automating the process, but currently it's a manual effort to publish to PyPi. We are experiencing some problems with the publishing, but the issue should get resolved soon. Best Anton пт, 31 авг. 2018 г. в 23:29, Alfredo Luque <[email protected]>: > See here: > https://pypi.org/project/mxnet-cu90mkl/#history > > No builds show up since 8/22. From what I can tell, other variants (eg; > mxnet-mkl) are up to date. > > On August 31, 2018 at 2:24:30 PM, Anton Chernov ([email protected]) > wrote: > > Hi Alfredo! > > Could you provide more info on this? Where do you get the information? > > Best > Anton > > пт, 31 авг. 2018 г. в 22:49, Alfredo Luque > <[email protected] > >: > > > Just curious why the latest build is 2018-08-22 while the other variants > > are up to date. > > > > Thanks, > > > > — > > Alfredo Luque > > Software Engineer > > Machine Learning Infrastructure > > Airbnb > > San Francisco, CA > > > > — > Alfredo Luque > Software Engineer > Machine Learning Infrastructure > Airbnb > San Francisco, CA > — Alfredo Luque Software Engineer Machine Learning Infrastructure Airbnb San Francisco, CA
