+1 since the Beam model is much more open than the current one. Here my two cents to the discussion:
You can see that in the past was different,, but we had evolved as foundation. As general recommendation, the new way is to spend less effort in ad-hoc bylaws on every project/podling and adopt the general ones. The easier the project is managed, normally the better the community evolves. In addition, as a linguistic detail: commiters and/or pmc do not have more "privileges", but "responsibilities". Cheers, On Mon, Oct 29, 2018, 15:47 Carin Meier <carinme...@gmail.com> wrote: > This vote is to adopt the document > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Become+an+Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+Committer+and+PPMC+Member+Proposal > to replace the current document > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Becoming+a+Committer > > The dev discussion thread is here > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e61ffa26af374de7a99c475d406e462a00b26cfc1155e232198dd53e@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E > > The vote will be a procedural issue vote as defined > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > Votes on procedural issues follow the common format of majority rule unless > otherwise stated. That is, if there are more favourable votes than > unfavourable ones, the issue is considered to have passed -- regardless of > the number of votes in each category. (If the number of votes seems too > small to be representative of a community consensus, the issue is typically > not pursued. However, see the description of lazy consensus > <https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus> for a > modifying factor.) > > The vote will run until Friday Nov 2nd at 6:00 am EST > > Thanks, > Carin >
