Thanks for making me aware of the issue. I started the fix here [1].

And thanks to Qing Lan and Zach Kimberg for pinging me and helping with 
isolating the problem.

-sz

[1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/14148

On 2019/02/13 19:45:41, Aaron Markham <aaron.s.mark...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> Sheng, thanks for being so proactive, but adding license headers to
> the markdown files in #14142 breaks the website as I warned. I caught
> it before it went live.
> I've disabled website publishing until this situation is resolved.
> 
> 
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 10:59 AM Sheng Zha <zhash...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Update: All license issues mentioned in the general vote from Luciano (pom
> > files, docker files, docs) have been fixed on master [1][2].
> >
> > Let me know if there's more to address.
> >
> > -sz
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/14138
> > [2] https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/14142
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 7:54 AM Michael Wall <mjw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > So is the plan option 3?  I have seen tickets fixing licenses, so good 
> > > work
> > > there.  When a vote is started on dev@mxnet.a.o, include wording about not
> > > waiting the full 72 hours since this is just updating licensing.  Get as
> > > many +1 votes as you can on both the release and not waiting then move on
> > > to IPMC.  The vote on general@incubator.a.o should still stay open 72
> > > hours.  I will look at it as soon as it is posted, but maybe reach out to
> > > the other mentors directly asking for their help to review as soon as it 
> > > is
> > > out.  The goal is to have the 3 or more +1 votes and more positive then
> > > negative as soon as the 72 hours hits.
> > >
> > > Mike
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 2:44 AM Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > forgot to CC dev
> > > >
> > > > > Begin forwarded message:
> > > > >
> > > > > From: Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com>
> > > > > Subject: Re: [RESTARTING][VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating)
> > > > version 1.4.0.rc2
> > > > > Date: 13 February 2019 at 6:43:48 pm AEDT
> > > > > To: Michael Wall <mjw...@gmail.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > >> Option 1:
> > > > >> Do nothing.  I don't know how a RESTARTED vote works.
> > > > >
> > > > > I don’t believe there is such a concept.
> > > > >
> > > > >> Option 2:
> > > > >> Start another vote thread on general@incubator.a.o pointing to the
> > > > original vote thread on dev@mxnet.a.o and the canceled vote thread.
> > > > >
> > > > > It may end up with the same outcome.
> > > > >
> > > > >> Option 3:
> > > > >> 1 - Fix the header issues.
> > > > > <snip>
> > > > >> 3 - Start a vote thread on general@incubator.a.o pointing to the new
> > > > vote thread from step 2.  Will likely need to be open 72 hours.
> > > > >
> > > > > Just be aware it can take longer, sometime much longer, to get the 3 
> > > > > +1
> > > > IPMC votes.
> > > > >
> > > > >> Tough position to be in with Horovod being released.
> > > > >
> > > > > Which show the risk of tying in your release cycle with a non Apache
> > > > product. IMO you need to be independent of 3rd party releases and not
> > > tied
> > > > to their milestones. If they wanted to include a particular unreleased
> > > > version of ASF software, you should started the release a long time 
> > > > ahead
> > > > of time just in case problems were encountered issues.This probably
> > > > wouldn't be an issue if you made more frequent releases, it’s easier to
> > > > check compliance with frequent releases so the 3rd party could just take
> > > > the last good release and go with that.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Justin
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> 

Reply via email to