Hi Pedro,

Thanks for taking the inititaive. Skimming through the design doc, I didn't see 
comparison with existing solutions such as relay in tvm, which is already a 
dependency of mxnet already. Could you elaborate on comparison with existing 
solutions in the design doc too?


On 2019/05/14 23:49:30, Pedro Larroy <pedro.larroy.li...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> Hi dev@
> As a result of my deep dives on the graph machinery I have created a
> new proposal to improve the operator graph in MXNet.
> This would mean superseding the use of NNVM Graph in MXNet and having
> a new implementation that we can use to simplify a lot of code and do
> powerful graph manipulation and passes such as operator fusion and
> other optimizations.
> As it would be a change with big impact and ramifications, your
> thoughts and feedback on the document would be highly appreciated so
> we can take potential future interesting use cases:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/MXVM%3A+Operator+graph+2.0
> Pedro.

Reply via email to