Hi Pedro, Thanks for taking the inititaive. Skimming through the design doc, I didn't see comparison with existing solutions such as relay in tvm, which is already a dependency of mxnet already. Could you elaborate on comparison with existing solutions in the design doc too?
-sz On 2019/05/14 23:49:30, Pedro Larroy <pedro.larroy.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi dev@ > > As a result of my deep dives on the graph machinery I have created a > new proposal to improve the operator graph in MXNet. > > This would mean superseding the use of NNVM Graph in MXNet and having > a new implementation that we can use to simplify a lot of code and do > powerful graph manipulation and passes such as operator fusion and > other optimizations. > > As it would be a change with big impact and ramifications, your > thoughts and feedback on the document would be highly appreciated so > we can take potential future interesting use cases: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/MXVM%3A+Operator+graph+2.0 > > Pedro. >
