I just added an initial list of adopters of MXNet Operator here: https://github.com/kubeflow/mxnet-operator/pull/63
*Commnity - If your company uses MXNet Operator, please let me know in the PR*. On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 9:08 AM Yuan Tang <terrytangy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Definitely. Thanks for asking and I am happy to provide more background. > > The MXNet Operator has v1 controller. However, there has no formal release > on GitHub and it has not been included in Kubeflow by default yet. Though > users are welcome to use it as a standalone k8s operator. This will > hopefully be something the community will help drive forward as the initial > authors are not active. I don't have a good idea of who's using it yet > externally but I'll start by adding an ADOPTERS.md. *If your company uses > MXNet Operator, please let me know*. I will post the link to the PR once > it's ready. > > Another easy-to-use option on k8s would be using Horovod + MXNet with > *Kubeflow > MPI Operator* [0] (I just added a section in MXNet's doc on this [1]), > which already has wide range of industry adopters [2] even though it's > still in v1alpha2. > > I would strongly encourage the community to contribute since the > ease-of-use on distributed Kubernetes cluster is one perspective to compete > with and learn from other frameworks. Kubeflow also has tf-operator and > pytorch-operator which are being used by many companies. > > [0] https://github.com/kubeflow/mpi-operator > [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/17974 > [2] > https://medium.com/kubeflow/introduction-to-kubeflow-mpi-operator-and-industry-adoption-296d5f2e6edc > > On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 3:10 PM sandeep krishnamurthy < > sandeep.krishn...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thanks for bringing this here to MXNet community Yuan and thank you and >> other contributors to bring MXNet operator in K8s. >> >> It would be very helpful if you can help us to by giving some details >> about >> current users of mxnet-operator in K8s or any users experimenting with it. >> This info about userbase would help me and other committers to prioritize >> this feature versus other feature requests in MXNet when we get proposals >> by new members to contribute. >> >> Best, >> Sandeep >> >> On Thu, 2 Apr 2020, 7:50 am Yuan Tang, <terrytangy...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Hi community, >> > >> > We are currently looking into adding support for Kubeflow deployment of >> > MXNet via the existing kubeflow/mxnet-operator: >> > https://github.com/kubeflow/mxnet-operator. If you are interested in >> > helping out and getting involved, please let us know in this issue: >> > https://github.com/kubeflow/kubeflow/issues/4805. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Yuan >> > >> > -- >> > Yuan Tang >> > https://terrytangyuan.github.io/about/ >> > <https://terrytangyuan.github.io/about/> >> > >> > > > -- > Yuan Tang > https://terrytangyuan.github.io/about/ > <https://terrytangyuan.github.io/about/> > -- Yuan Tang https://terrytangyuan.github.io/about/ <https://terrytangyuan.github.io/about/>
