Hi Michael, Thanks for offering help. I can represent the code donors and file the software grant. Should the filing go to secretary@?
Sheng > On Jul 5, 2020, at 9:50 AM, Michael Wall <mjw...@apache.org> wrote: > > Is this being tracked in a ticket anywhere? What help can I offer? > > Mike > >> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 6:44 PM Marco de Abreu <marco.g.ab...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Sheng, >> >> since this is a "large one off code contribution", the policy [1] states >> that they should be brought in through a software grant. >> >> Best regards, >> Marco >> >> [1]: https://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works/legal.html >> >>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 11:41 PM Sheng Zha <zhash...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> To mentors, >>> >>> Do we the PPMC need to fill out IP clearance for this code donation? >>> >>> -sz >>> >>> On 2019/04/24 21:19:49, Sheng Zha <zhash...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> The community has agreed to donate mshadow to the mxnet code base. I >>> will start the migration and build logic changes soon. >>>> >>>> -sz >>>> >>>> On 2019/04/07 21:47:39, Sheng Zha <zhash...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>> I agree it would make development easier to donate mshadow to mxnet >>> code base, since mshadow is only used in MXNet. I support donating the >>> mshadow code to mxnet and I started an RFC for this in mshadow [1]. >>>>> >>>>> [1] https://github.com/dmlc/mshadow/issues/373 >>>>> >>>>> -sz >>>>> >>>>> On 2019/04/06 04:38:19, Tianqi Chen <tqc...@cs.washington.edu> wrote: >>>>>> Technically, mshadow is sufficient for MXNet. Adopting other >>> libraries ( >>>>>> eigen or xtensor) will unnecessarily increase the codebase complexity >>>>>> without any additional gains. >>>>>> >>>>>> Given that mshadow is only used by mxnet. I do support donating it >>> into >>>>>> mxnet codebase. >>>>>> To respect the original mshadow community. I would recommend >>> starting a >>>>>> community RFC In the mshadow github issue for a week, before we >>> start the >>>>>> migrating process. >>>>>> Also, I would recommend a rebase merge just like the case of >>> MXNet.jl code >>>>>> base to preserve the contribution history. >>>>>> >>>>>> Tianqi >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 9:25 PM Alfredo Luque >>>>>> <alfredo.lu...@airbnb.com.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Do you have a link to both of these proposals? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 20:14 Anirudh Acharya < >>> anirudhk...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Pedro, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> mshadow is mostly used for tensor arithmetic. There have been >>> discussions >>>>>>>> about including it within mxnet. I think it is a good idea. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As a more long term solution using libraries like eigen to >>> perform linear >>>>>>>> algebra operations was also suggested by anirudh2290@. I think >>> xtensor( >>>>>>>> https://github.com/QuantStack/xtensor ) can also be a candidate >>> here. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>> Anirudh >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 7:03 PM Pedro Larroy < >>>>>>> pedro.larroy.li...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Some developers have noticed that working in mshadow is >>> cumbersome as >>>>>>>>> it's a 3rdparty subrepo. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Since mshadow is a bunch of headers which don't have much of >>>>>>>>> independent tests / library functionality, me and other >>> developers >>>>>>>>> believe that it would be good to assimilate this code in the >>>>>>>>> repository for ease of contribution and changes without having >>> to go >>>>>>>>> trough contortions to test PRs that modify mshadow. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Would anybody oppose this change? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks and have a nice weekend. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Pedro. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>
