@saudet Thanks for your proposal. I have three questions would like to ask you:
1. If we adopt JavaCpp package, how will that be consumed? Under byteco or apache MXNet? Essentially from our previous discussion, we really don't want another 3rdparty checkin. 2. Can you also do a benchmark on the MXNet's API's performance and possibly share the reproducible code? I did have 3. We do have some additional technical issue with JavaCpp, is there any plan to fix it? (I will put it into a separate comment since it is really big. -- You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/17783#issuecomment-663137329
