> Yes, i have looked into Shale and plan to use it. Its > proposal clearly > spells out the value-adds for web-based application.
Ah... yes, I read your name some time ago on a Shale disscussion... :-) Regards, Matthias > Regards > > BaTien > DBGROUPS > > >Regards, > >Matthias > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 8:45 PM > >To: Struts Developers List > >Subject: Shale for 2.x? (was Re: RoadMap) > > > > > >Objectively, I think that Shale would be a better fit for Apache > >MyFaces. > > > >Back in the day, it might have been better if we had placed > most of our > >taglibs with Jakarta Taglibs, rather than keep them all > here. I think > >this is the same sort of thing. > > > >Since I'm not doing the work, I can't make the decision, but > I think it > >would be nice if a serious proposal were made to Apache > MyFaces before > >launching Shale from here. > > > >Shale has been mentioned on the MyFaces lists a couple of > times, but no > >one has asked the question "Do we want to host Shale here at Apache > >MyFaces?". > > > >Apache MyFaces already has generic JSF components, and Shale fits in > >that venue. They also have a very strong JSF community that can > >appreciate, support, and enhance Shale. > > > >Eventually, if everyone migrates to Shale, and the Struts community > >withers away, then so be it. > > > >Let Darwin decide. > > > >-Ted. > > > >On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 10:50:42 -0800, Craig McClanahan wrote: > > > > > >> On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 10:21:24 -0500, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>> Is there anything someone would like put differently? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> I'm somewhat curious when the Struts committers might be > willing to > >> make a conscious choice for a Struts 2.x architecture. > >> > >> While I'm personally going to continue to support the > 1.3.x changes > >> for evolution of existing apps, and use of the Struts-Faces > >> integration library with it, I believe that Struts will become > >> gradually less relevant for new application development unless it > >> adopts JSF strongly; and it would be a shame to have to *compete* > >> with Struts instead of *being* Struts. > >> > >> > >> > >>> -Ted. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> Craig > >> > >> > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > >> additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > >. > > > > > > >
