+1 Anton
On Fri, January 7, 2005 6:32 am, Martin Marinschek said: > +1 for a meta decision ;) > > > On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:25:17 +0100, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> +1 >> >> What about this decision itself, do we need a meta decision process? ;-) >> Oh, I love recursive self-references :-) >> >> Manfred >> >> Heath Borders schrieb: >> > +1 >> > >> > >> > On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:44:07 +0100, Martin Marinschek >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> >>+1 >> >> >> >>regards, >> >> >> >>Martin >> >> >> >> >> >>On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 05:21:22 -0700, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>>Hi All, >> >>> >> >>>I'd like to propose that we use the same process that Tomcat uses; >> >>> >> >>>http://jakarta.apache.org/site/decisions.html >> >>> >> >>>As you can read in the copied thread below this is one of the last >> >>>remaining items before we become a top level project (cool!) so we >> need >> >>>to nail this down RSN. >> >>> >> >>>I believe all we have to do is point to this page (correct Ted?) >> >>> >> >>>Thoughts? >> >>> >> >>>TTFN, >> >>> >> >>>-bd- >> >>> >> >>>On Jan 7, 2005, at 3:01 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: >> >>> >> >>> >> >>>>>We mentioned applying for TLP in the proposal. So, if that's >> >>>>>what we still want, then yes. >> >>>>> >> >>>>>Unless, of course, there is another TLP that you would like >> >>>>>to join instead. >> >>>>> >> >>>>>Personally, I think the scope is broad enough to justify its >> >>>>>own project. >> >>>> >> >>>>Yes, think so too. So with a TLP myfaces.apache.org, there is >> >>>>enough room for subprojects like you guys to with Struts. >> >>>> >> >>>>One candiate will be perhaps the WML RenderKit >> >>>>and the extra components. (the TilesViewHandler one I'd like >> >>>>to see inside of tiles.apache.org -Yes I saw your draft on >> >>>>that) >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>>> Ok, we have to *convert* the documentation etc into forrest xml >> >>>>>> stuff, that should be added to >> http://incubator.apache.org/myfaces/ >> >>>>> >> >>>>>Of course, you know that Forrest is not a *requirement*. You >> >>>>>can use anything you like. >> >>>>> >> >>>>>I'm not sure about PHP though. We'd have to check with >> >>>>>infrastructure. There's an inclination to have the sites end >> >>>>>up as HTML, to minimize server load. >> >>>> >> >>>>Since I got a basic knowledge of forrest and since it is >> >>>>usable from ANT, I think forrest will be fine. Also the >> >>>>current homepage is based upon forrest, so why not continue. >> >>>> >> >>>>At weekend I will try to convert some docs from myfaces.org >> >>>>to our page. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>>I didn't mean that I added, only that, if it were me, I'd >> >>>>>make it a status "page" rather than a status "file". >> >>>>> >> >>>>>You might just add a "Status" page to the Community tab. A >> >>>>>"Roadmap" page might do as well. What the checklist says is: >> >>>>> >> >>>>>" (Committers, non-incubation action items, project resources, >> etc)" >> >>>>> >> >>>>>There are Incubator PMC members who do insist that projects >> >>>>>have a "status file", so we need to make sure this is handled >> somehow. >> >>>> >> >>>>Ok, I try... >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>>> that looks very *generic* but why the mention of Struts inside of >> >>>>>> ibatis? >> >>>>> >> >>>>>Oops, typo. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>>>> I need to lookup some historical dates for the Incubator status >> >>>>>>> page, but we seem otherwise good to go. >> >>>>> >> >>>>>I slacked on the dates and just updated the page in >> >>>>>Subversion to say "DONE", but haven't published it yet. >> >>>>> >> >>>>>As far as TODOs go, what's left are the "decision making >> guidelines". >> >>>>> >> >>>>>-Ted. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> > >> > >> >
