Yes, I use also the myfaces.jar
But Jonas and also Craig where mentioning, that a split will be *cleaner*
Perhaps Jonas or Craig could pointed out to your list...
-Matthias
Heath Borders wrote:
I also use the combined jar for those reasons.
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:39:15 -0500, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I use the combined jar for the same reasons as Bruno.
sean
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 10:26:13 +0100, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
yes, I would say that, too...
is there any problem in providing both?
regards,
Martin
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:59:10 +0100 (CET), Bruno Aranda - Dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
In my opinion it is ok to have both alternatives. I use the all-in-one because I build from cvs very often and it is easier to replace my *old* myfaces.jar...
Bruno
Hi all,
I got email from Jonas (Oracle) and he asked why we provide myfaces.jar and a standalone version (api, extention, impl, wml)
I remember, that we did a split in *old* SF codebase. Craig mentioned splitting them should be cleaner.
But now there is again a myfaces.jar and also the standalone version. (http://tinyurl.com/4skb6)
Shouldn't we better keep the separate instead a all-in-one JAR?
Any thoughts?
Thanks, Matthias
-- Matthias We�endorf Aechterhoek 18 DE-48282 Emsdetten Germany phone: +49-2572-9170275 cell phone: +49-179-1118979 email: matzew AT apache DOT org url: http://www.wessendorf.net callto://mwessendorf (Skype) icq: 47016183
