I’m thinking that the problem with increasing the size of the
HTTP header buffer is unrelated to JSF/Portlet integration. There is only a
tiny bit of extra info in the session to support JSF/Portlet. The only thing I
put in there is the current view name. I bet if you ran the JSF app outside
the portal then you would get the same problem.
Stan
From: Kito D. Mann
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 8:52
PM
To: MyFaces
Development
Subject: RE: MyFaces and Portlet
Yeah, I tried that but it's still not clear to me. Any thoughts on the
necessity of increasing the size of the HTTP header buffer in Tomcat?
From: Kito D. Mann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005
12:14 PM
To: MyFaces
Development
Subject: Re: MyFaces and Portlet
FYI, I've been working with the MyFaces portlet support and Liferay and have
run into a couple of issues. I've made progress, but I'm still working out some
kinks. I think they just made some changes for the portlet integration
available for the RI. You can read the thread here: http://forums.liferay.com/index.php?act=Search&CODE=simpleresults&sid=e27fa33acc88facc8df62dc7cee115a8&highlite=myfaces,
Kito D. Mann
Author, JavaServer Faces in Action
http://www.JSFCentral.com
- JSF FAQ, news, and info
Are you using JSF in a project? Send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
you could win a free copy of JavaServer Faces in Action!
At 12:57 AM 3/8/2005, you wrote:
Thanks. I am going to try the MyFaces built-in JSF support.
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 20:39:40 -0800 (PST), David Le Strat
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Derek,
>
> FYI, I created a sample app in Jetspeed 2 using the
> new built-in myfaces bridge. Check out the latest
> from CVS if you are interested. Works like a charm.
> We also have our own bridge which supports myfaces as
> well.
>
> Regards,
>
> David Le Strat.
>
> --- Derek Shen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I am working on a project to integrate JSF and
> > Portlet. The first step
> > is to create JSF based portlet. Did some research
> > and there are
> > different approaches to achieve it.
> >
> > One approach is to provide JSF bridge. Basically, to
> > create a
> > JSFPortlet and use it as a bridge to the
> > FacesServlet. Sun,
> > exoplatform and many others already provide this
> > kind of solution.
> >
> > Another approach is to complete the JSF
> > implementation. JSF spec
> > already contains the support for porlet, however,
> > most JSF
> > implementation is not complete and does not support
> > porlet. I think it
> > is a much better approach.
> >
> > Glad to see the Stan Silvert
provided the portlet
> > support patch for
> > MyFaces. Actually, his changes are included inside
> > 1.0.9.
> >
> > Did anyone created a sample JSF based portlet using
> > the new code? Stan
> > claimed that he has tested his changes on Pluto. Any
> > idea about how it
> > works? For my understanding, I still need to create
> > some kind of
> > bridge JSF portlet and somehow to forward the
> > request to FacesServlet.
> >
> > Please advice. Thanks.
> > Derek
> >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Kito D. Mann ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Virtua, Inc. (phone: 203-323-1244 fax: 203-323-2363)
Author, JavaServer Faces in Action (http://www.manning.com/mann/index.html)
http://www.JSFCentral.com
- JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info
"Existence doesn't necessarily mean living..."
