[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-121?page=comments#action_60591 ] Manfred Geiler commented on MYFACES-121: ----------------------------------------
The patch simply makes JspViewHandlerImpl take the first FacesServlet mapping in the web.xml as default. So, since 99% of users will have only one FacesServlet mapping in the web.xml anyway, I do not see a real problem for this. There only remains one small very special issue: You cannot use Struts and Faces while having two FacesServlet mapping of different kinds (one extension mapping and one path mapping). I think we can live with that. ;-) +1 No objection. > struts-faces incompatibilities with .do servlet mapping > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: MYFACES-121 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-121 > Project: MyFaces > Type: Improvement > Versions: Nightly Build > Reporter: Mike Traum > Attachments: JspViewHandlerImpl.patch > > MyFaces is incompatible with struts-faces. There are several threads about > this issue: > - http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg01610.html > - http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00265.html > The crux of the problem lies in the fact that JspViewHandlerImpl.renderView > attempts to determine the servlet mapping of the current request. When > coming through struts-faces, the servletPath will be ".do" (or whatever > struts 'action' is mapped to), and JspViewHandlerImpl.getServletMapping > will throw an exception if it does not match the servlet mapping for the > faces servlet. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
