I'm not so worried about 1.0.9, my comment was directed more towards the release after this one. Since there are many people that will want to use an Apache licensed certified JSF Implementation, but may not have the need for the MyFaces components, I thought I'd bring up the idea of making the components a subproject.
Anyone have any thoughts? > -----Original Message----- > From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 10:45 AM > To: MyFaces Development > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Two tree controls > > Howard, > > I think we have resolved this issue for now. I agree with you that > this type of disagreement should not impact the next release. Since > we can't seem to find a way out of the tree vs tree2 discussion both > will be included in the next release (and all forseeable future > releases.) So there will be no scheduling impact on the next release > now that this has been resolved. > > sean > > > On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 12:56:09 -0500, Abrams, Howard A > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +0 > > > > I suggest that the MyFaces custom components be moved to a subproject. A > > debate such as "Tree vs. Tree2" shouldn't hold up a release of the JSF > > implementation and API. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 5:56 AM > > > To: MyFaces Development > > > Subject: [VOTE] Two tree controls > > > > > > I propose a vote to end the tree vs tree2 controversey. Since it > > > seems that Oliver and I have reached an impasse (to put it mildly), I > > > move that we have two tree controls: tree and tree2 and let the user > > > decide which is best for them. > > > > > > While I think it is unfortunate that we cannot agree on a single new > > > tree control together this is probably the best course of action for > > > the sake of the team. So I'd like a vote on this so I can know for > > > sure how to go forward. > > > > > > I will start the voting ... +1 for me > > > > > > ps. I know we don't like voting but I think its important to have > > > voting for big decisions like this. Oliver and I have both put a lot > > > of time into the respective tree controls so its only fair that we ask > > > the group for direction on how to proceed. > > > > > > > >
