We would have to parse the response then, and add it properly. The issue is that you cannot guarantee that the <html /> tag will be closed after the <f:view /> tag is. When the <f:view /> is closed, that's when the endDocument() method is called. So, if a user has the following JSP:
<f:view> <f:verbatim> <html> </f:verbatim> <%-- more JSF content --%> <f:verbatim> </html> </f:verbatim> </f:view> This could result in the following html: <html> <!-- rendered JSF content --> </html> <form name="dummyForm" action="foo.faces"> </form> <script language="Javascript"> // autoscroll javascript </script> On Apr 1, 2005 12:36 PM, Korhonen, Kalle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Heath Borders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: ResponseWriter.endDocument() vs. ADF Faces (and, hello) > > Why can't we wrap every commandLink/commandButton in its own > > dummy form if it doesn't have a parent form? This would mean > > See the JIRA on this > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-152?page=comments#action_61924. > I suggested to use ExtensionsFilter for this � la SiteMesh, what do you think? > > Kalle > -- -Heath Borders-Wing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
