+1 for adding client-side state encryption
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 8:02 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: JSF 1.2 and TCK
>
> What about the 1.2 changes that do not conflict with 1.1? For
> example, encryption of the client-side state. Does it make sense to
> implement those features now as long as they don't interfere with the
> 1.1 TCK? That one in particular I have been thinking about for a
> while so I was glad to see it added to the spec.
>
> sean
>
>
> On 4/18/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 4/18/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > With the 1.2 spec nearing finalization what are the plans for TCK?
> > > Would we try to certify MyFaces against 1.1 or 1.2? If we are
going
> > > for 1.2 that is a ways off but on the other hand, we could start
> > > thinking about implementing some of the stuff in 1.2 that is also
> > > going to be implemented in the RI version.
> > >
> >
> > As there hasn't been any implementation work on the 1.2 changes yet,
> > I'd certainly recommend going for 1.1 certification in the short
term.
> > That would be what people are using today.
> >
> > Craig
> >
>
