Oliver, I fear you are right. Here is my sad +1 for removing $Log$
-Manfred 2005/5/11, Oliver Rossmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > +1 for removing the $Log$ stuff. There is no support for the Log (or a > similar) keyword in subversion so I suppose it's better to remove the > log entries from the source files as they won't get any updates. As Sean > said: all the information is in the svn logs anyway, no need from my POV > to maintain the same information in the source files. > > Oliver > > Sean Schofield wrote: > > >+1 for removing them. Subversion (and CVS) keeps the same history and > >they just clutter up the source code and documentation. > > > > > >On 5/9/05, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>SVN experts, is there really no alternative or backward compatibility > >>solution? > >>:-( > >>-Manfred > >> > >>2005/5/8, Sylvain Vieujot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> > >> > >>> Yes, I found that nice too :-( > >>> > >>> > >>> On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 21:27 +0200, Martin Marinschek wrote: > >>> oh yes... > >>> > >>>what a pity, I liked that small tidbit of information! > >>> > >>>regards, > >>> > >>>Martin > >>> > >>>On 5/8/05, Sylvain Vieujot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>Subversion doesn't support the $Log$ : > >>>>http://subversion.tigris.org/faq.html#log-in-source > >>>> > >>>>As those $Log$ sections will be outdated, I think we should start removing > >>>>them. > >>>> > >>>>Any thoughts ? > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > > -- > Oliver Rossmueller > Software Engineer and IT-Consultant > Hamburg, Germany > http://www.rossmueller.com > >
