What happened to the first sandbox debate?
On 5/11/05, Grant Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to kick off the whole sandbox debate again. Yes, I'm a sucker > for punishment.. > > If I recall correctly, the consensus was to have a "sandbox subproject" > for new components. I would like to propose a simpler solution: Why not > have the sandbox as a subdirectory of the existing project. Then we can > just specify all "s:" components as sandbox components until they are > completely accepted by the community. At that time they can become "x:" > components. > > Would this satisfy the ASF's requirement for "All New Components Must Go > Through the Incubator" ? Hopefully... > >
