Yes I suggest we keep it Nightly Build as well because we actually have a nightly build that users can grab and the issue will be fixed there.
sean On 5/20/05, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 for renaming the nightly version to 1.0.x when the time has come > (Sean's suggestion) > > +1 for keeping the name "Nighly Build" - in fact it will be fixed in > this nightly's build, so there should not be too many misconceptions. > > regards, > > Martin > > On 5/20/05, Oliver Rossmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sean Schofield wrote: > > > > >Manfred, > > > > > >If we're going to use the 1.0.10 version in JIRA here is what I > > >suggest. Find any issue that is currently marked with that version > > >and change to nightly (there shouldn't be many since you just added > > >it.) > > > > > Sean, > > > > actually it was me who created the 1.0.10 entry. > > > > >Then edit the versions and rename nightly to 1.0.10. This way > > >all of the issues marked nightly will be changed to 1.0.10 without > > >adding a log entry in JIRA and sending new emails. > > > > > >Either we have a Nightly and change later (like I was suggesting) or > > >we abandon Nightly and have just 1.0.10. I'm ok with dropping nightly > > >if you and Oliver feel that this is the way to go but we have to fix > > >it now so we don't have to manually change all of the ones marked > > >"nightly" later on down the road. Better to manually fix the one or > > >two marked 1.0.10 then the dozens marked nightly. > > > > > > > > I was not aware it is possible to rename a version in Jira. If it works > > that way I'm fine with using the scheme you suggested. But shouldn't we > > rename "Nighly Build" to "Upcoming release" then to avoid any doubts a > > user might have about the meaning of "Fixed in Nightly Build" ? > > > > Oliver > > > > >sean > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Oliver Rossmueller > > Software Engineer and IT-Consultant > > Hamburg, Germany > > http://www.rossmueller.com > > > > >
