I thought the JSF 1.2 spec was going to address "tree creation and content interweaving." I don't recall the elimination of f:verbatim but I seem to recall them addressing the server-side include problems that force us to use f:verbatim. Am I mistaken on that?
sean On 5/24/05, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unfortunately not. > JSF 1.2 is only meant to be an improved JSF 1.x version. Nothing > revolutonary like "no more verbatim". > As Matthias has mentioned, a new JSP spec will be necessary to be able > to get access to the JSP source code right before the JSP container > handles (and outputs) the verbatim text. > These things will be handled in JSF 2.0, for which there exists no JCP > yet, AFAIK. > HTH, > Manfred > > 2005/5/24, Sylvain Vieujot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Manfred, could you tell us about that ? > > Will the 1.2 make this tag useless ? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Sylvain. > > > > > > On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 08:22 +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > Interesting component. But I guess the complex <f:verbatim> issue will > > be fix in JSF 1.2 (that relies on JSP 2.1). Or am I wrong with that > > guess ? > > > > > > > > On 5/24/05, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Very good idea! > > > > > > +1 from me for that, I'd sure as hell love to get rid of those > > > f:verbatim tags all over the place. > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > Martin > > > > > > On 5/24/05, Sylvain Vieujot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > For the example, you are right, if the text is that ... just text. > > > > But as it often occurs to be more complex (with tags, ...), you end up > > > > having to need both. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 00:21 -0400, Sean Schofield wrote: > > > > Sounds interesting. I will try to put forward a formal sandbox > > > > proposal for us to vote on later this week. This sounds like a good > > > > candidate for sandbox. I've got a component of my own for the sandbox > > > > as well. > > > > > > > > sean > > > > > > > > btw, in your example wouldn't you only need <f:verbatim><h1>bla > > > > blah</h1></f:verbatim> ? > > > > > > > > On 5/23/05, Sylvain Vieujot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I'm preparing a new component to render html tags : > > > > > > > > > > <x:htmlTag value="h1">bla bla</x:htmlTag> > > > > > would render : <h1>bla bla</h1> > > > > > > > > > > The goal is to avoid the > > <f:verbatim><h1></f:verbatim>bla > > > > > bla<f:verbatim></h1></f:verbatim> codes. > > > > > ... and to avoid doing one component by html tag (like the very > > usefull > > > > > <x:div>). > > > > > > > > > > Any suggestion ? > > > > > Any better tag name ? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > Sylvain. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
