On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 14:33 -0400, Matt Blum wrote:
I agree with Martin.
I think a boring name like "components" would be much more meaningful than a cool name like "tomahawk."
-Matt
On 5/30/05, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would suggest picking a meaningful name rather than some kind of code
name, in the interest of transparency to your users. Someone seeing
references to tomahawk or lonewolf or moccasin is going to have no clue
what it's about. (This is why Jakarta Commons has a guideline on using
meaningful names instead of "cool" names.)
Oh, and by the way, a moccasin is also a kind of dangerous snake. ;-)
--
Martin Cooper
On Mon, 30 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> Since a few of the developers don't like tomahawk :-( I wanted to
> start a thread for name / code-name ideas for a components + goodies
> subproject. I don't have any ideas offhand but lets get a list
> together and pick one.
>
> I know Manfred had a few suggestions when we last discussed this ...
>
> sean
>
