> -----Original Message----- > From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Suggested codenames for new components subproject > > You might want to take a look at the editor's note here: > > http://people.apache.org/~craigmcc/struts-shale-README.html > > for an explanation of why Shale was chosen for that project. > I remember Craig's reasoning. My point is that shale is a > catchy name. A lot easier way to identify the subproject > then calling it "enhanced controller built on JSF."
Besides being just "catchy" names, both Struts and Shale mean something and IMHO, are very appropriately chosen to describe the intended purpose of the projects. Whereas Tomahawk doesn't imply anything about components or extensions, so my +1 for MyFaces Extensions if nothing better comes up. Kalle
