On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
I beg to differ. You are interpreting the word "extensions" too narrowly.
Adding components over and above those that are part of the spec is most
definitely *extending* the set of available components. So "extensions" is
a perfectly appropriate name.
The fact that you and I are interpreting the word "extensions"
differently proves my point. The intended meaning of the word is not
clear.
I'd be interested in knowing how you define "extensions" if that doesn't
include additions to the base JSF spec. What is an extension if not an
addition?
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=extension&x=0&y=0
In particular, 1b and 7a.
--
Martin Cooper
Martin Cooper
sean
