Thanks for the feedback. I skipped the codegen stuff for the initial pass. We can (and will) deal with it eventually. Some of it appears to be necessary for the WAP stuff (which belongs in tomahawk) so I have to think on that a bit.
sean On 6/21/05, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Impressive. Thanks Sean for taking the time and neuron processing time > to reorganize the SVN. I've just done a checkout of the current > without problems. At first sight, it looks very clear and intuitive. > This is, indeed, a more natural organization of the project. The > svn:externals system is really good and works like a charm. > > I am eager to see all this working ;-) > > By the way, for the code generation stuff I would use a root called > tools, as you propose in an earlier post (tools/codegen,tools/xdoclet, > tools/wml). > > Regards, > > Bruno > > 2005/6/21, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I finished up a test run of the reorg. There are several outstanding > > issues (no lib directory etc.) but there is enough there for you to > > get the picture. > > > > You can browse it at: http://svn.apache.org/repos/test/myfaces/ > > > > To get the latest do a checkout of: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/test/myfaces/current and you will see the > > svn:externals in action! > > > > As I mentioned, we will have the latest code (just before the move) > > tagged so that the old structure and files will be available. I > > didn't do that in the test server but you can see what I mean if you > > check out the last tagged version of the code: > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/test/myfaces/core/tags/rel_1_0_9/ > > > > sean > > >
