Sounds good. Manfred is right that it was always included. The javadocs will be separated by subproject as well. That will be nice.
sean On 6/28/05, James Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think the TLD javadoc should definitely be included in the distro, > and would not mind seeing the core TLD as well. > > My two cents worth, > James > > On 6/28/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What do people think about including javadoc in the binary distro? > > Obviously the javadoc won't be in the SVN but should it be included in > > the distro? What about the javadoc for the TLD? > > > > sean > > >
