Matze, you are right - these depencies exist... but it looks as those classes could wander into the shared class-set, they rather look like general util classes.
regards, Martin On 7/6/05, Jesse Alexander (KBSA 21) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > User-wish: > > yes: make tomahawk RI-compatible > but: keep JavaScript free as an option > > thanks > Alexander >
