If there is an automated way without svn, of course +1 from me Thanks, -Manfred
2005/7/6, Grant Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > +1 > > Sean Schofield wrote: > > >I know you are probably tired of my proposals by now ;-) ... but there > >is more work to be done. > > > >We should remove the stuff from myfaces/site from SVN. This is the > >*transformed* HTML and IMO it doesn't really belong in SVN (for the > >same reasons we discussed on the earlier lib thread.) > > > >For those who aren't famliar with the website build procedure we use > >forrest to build the HTML (forrest docs should remain in SVN > >obviously). Then the HTML is checked into SVN. Then a chron script > >on minotaur does a SVN update to pull down the updated files. > > > >I could give a long list of reasons why this is a PITA but I'm > >thinking most people will probably agree. In the interim I'm thinking > >we build a tarball, scp to minotaur, remove existing website, replace > >with new tarball. All done by ant. Eventually we can move it to > >Maven but I think the Maven investigation/debate will take some time > >to resolve. > > > >sean > > > >. > > > > > > > >
