Strange.  Last night I ran a brand new checkout and then did 'ant
download-dependencies tlddoc-all' (just to make sure) and everything
worked fine.  (You checked out "current" right?)

Let me know what you come up with.

sean


On 7/7/05, Grant Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  Hi Sean,
>  
>  I did in fact run it from the top level build directory. It looks like a
> directory is not created ahead of the generation. I don't have time to look
> into it this morning but I will certainly look into it before the weekend.
>  
>  
>  
>  Sean Schofield wrote: 
>  Grant,
> 
> You have to use 'ant tlddoc-all' from the *top level* build directory
> only. If you want to build a specific subproject you use 'tlddoc' to
> build the *current* subproject. Same with dist-all, etc. There are a
> few more minor issues of this nature that I hope to document tomorrow.
>  I spent most of the day exploring David's new TilesViewHandler for my
> day job.
> 
> Also, I am hoping to add a failure message if you accidentally run a
> 'foo-all' target from subproject build dir instructing you to run from
> the top-level.
> 
> HTH,
> 
> sean
> 
> On 7/6/05, Grant Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  
>  
>  Sean,
> 
> The tlddoc-all target of the main buildfile (which calls all the nested
> buildfiles) is choking on:
> 
> tlddoc:
>  [java] Error: File/directory not found:
> /home/grant/IdeaProjects/Myfaces/current/build/../sandbox/build/temp/tlds/*.tld
> 
> for each of the subprojects. I didn't want to touch it while you were
> modifying the build procedure.
> 
> 
> Sean Schofield wrote:
> 
>  
>  
>  The SVN reorg is basically complete. There are lots of loose ends to
> tie up but everything has been moved to where it belongs. We may make
> a few minor changes to things in the future but at this point I think
> its safe to start working off the source.
> 
> I will post a more complete overview of the SVN setup in the next day
> or so. I'll also work on putting something up on our website
> addressing the new SVN structure.
> 
> The source can be checked out at
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/current. This will
> link you
> to all of the relevant subprojects.
> 
> The new sandbox project is in place. I added a new component that
> Matt and I worked on called inputSuggest. Its basically a text input
> field that "suggests" choices as you type in it. Its similar to
> Google Suggest if you've ever seen that before. No AJAX at the moment
> but I think that is a topic for another thread. There is also a new
> sandbox.war built by the ant script.
> 
> If you run ant download-dependencies dist-all in the top level build
> directory you will build everything. You can also run dist in the
> relevant subdirectory and it will build (or rebuild) just that
> subdirectory. Building specific subdirectories does require that you
> build the subprojects that are dependent on other subprojects is fine
> as long as they are built in the correct order.
> 
> It seems like there are a few oddities regarding svn externals. If
> you change two files in two different subprojects (that you checked
> out using "current") then it seems like you have to commit the two
> subprojects one at a time. Ex. you change tree2 and tree2.jsp then
> you have to commit tomahawk and then examples. If any of you svn
> gurus know if there is a way around this that would be good.
> 
> There are still a few bugs in the examples apps. I will write a
> separate post summarizing these issues. The next step is to get the
> nightly builds up and running. That shouldn't be too hard. I wrote
> the bootstrap.xml to take advantage of build.xml for most of the work
> (except checkout and publishing.)
> 
> James, if you are ready for some maven work, I'd be interested to see
> if we couldn't publish the website and nightly builds using maven (but
> still build them with ant for now.) If that isn't workable we can
> continue doing the process entirely by ant.
> 
> Finally, I hope to get to updating the website documentation and a few
> other things later this week. I'll float a few proposals I have for
> additions to the site and improvements in the documentation for us to
> discus.
> 
> sean
> 
> ps. I'm interested in hearing how Java One went and how MyFaces (and
> JSF in general was received.)
> 
> .
> 
> 
> 
>  
>  
>  .
> 
>  
>  
>

Reply via email to