I agree with Stan here. I'd rather see the 1 or 2 second slow down and have it be simple.

TTFN,

-bd-

On Jul 7, 2005, at 1:49 PM, Stan Silvert wrote:

Actually, I don't think we want to *require* download-dependencies
when running dist-all (or any other target.) Itwill be run as part of
the nightly and release targets (in bootstrap) but I don't think we
should require this step.  Recall users have the option of supplying
their own libs and this would be a wasted step.

sean


It's a step that only adds a second or two to the full build if nothing
gets downloaded.  If something does get downloaded, then you needed it
anyway.

If you supply your own libs then you have already taken on the task of
modifying the build for your own needs (even if it is just a property
change).

My vote is to err on the side of making it as easy as possible for new
developers to build the latest code.  Any hindrance to building, like
knowing that you have to run download-dependencies before you do
anything else, discourages newcomers.

Again, developers who are new to a project expect to be able to just do
a full checkout and then type "ant".

Stan



On 7/7/05, Stan Silvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Done.  I added download-dependencies to the dist-all target.

BTW, the portlet stuff looks fine.

Stan Silvert
JBoss, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
callto://stansilvert


-----Original Message-----
From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 3:05 PM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: MyFaces and Portlets [ was RE: Problem with TLD in

new

App

Distro]


Given that developers expect the plain old "ant" command to just

work,

shouldn't we make that dependent on the download-dependencies

task?


Good point, although I never use just "ant" ;-)  Feel free to

change

the build script to incorporate this change (and the necessary

portlet

changes.)


Stan Silvert


sean




Reply via email to