we don't want to copy anything of the code, of course.
We have already implemented that ourselves, but it should really be effort wasted if we re-javadoc everything as well ;)
We got told by Apache Buffs that this would not be possible - we would someone who originally wrote the JavaDoc to provide a patch for Apache MyFaces. Maybe you would be able to arrange something like that?
thank you very much for your efforts,
regards,
Martin
On 7/21/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/21/05, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for looking into this for us Craig.
>
> Seems like a big waste of effort for us to reinvent that wheel.
>
> Besides if we document the methods incorrectly we probably won't be
> spec compliant :-)
Hmm ... I don't remember any TCK tests that checked the English
language stuff ... just the Java language stuff :-).
>
> TTFN,
>
> -bd-
Craig
>
> On Jul 21, 2005, at 10:43 AM, Craig McClanahan wrote:
>
> > So, the question is about copying the JavaDocs from the RI's
> > jsf-api.jar file, but not the code? I'm gonna have to ask what the
> > precise rules are and get back to you on that.
> >
> > Craig
> >
> >
> > On 7/21/05, Bruno Aranda < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Sorry, that was the answer to the other proposal ;-)
> >>
> >> For the JavaDoc stuff, le'ts hear what Craig can tell us...
> >>
> >> Bruno
> >>
> >> 2005/7/21, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> For me it is better to introduce a new dependency if we can create
> >>> better tests (and faster) than using nasty workarounds...
> >>>
> >>> Bruno
> >>>
> >>> 2005/7/21, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi All,
> >>>>
> >>>> Is there an issue with copying the javadoc from the spec classes? I
> >>>> remember someone said we could not use the jsf-api.jar file a long
> >>>> time ago but the java doc is part of the spec. We should be able to
> >>>> copy that correct? So I'd like to propose that as I'm adding
> >>>> tests to
> >>>> the javax.faces.* packages that I also add javadoc to these
> >>>> classes.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thoughts?
> >>>>
> >>>> TTFN,
> >>>>
> >>>> -bd-
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>
