You're welcome, Sean. Thanks for your kind words :-) Best regards,
Bruno 2005/7/25, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Yeah that works. Good idea. I guess in the future we'll need to keep > in mind that autogenerated ids aren't going to be rendered unless you > provide your own special prefix. > > Thanks > > sean > > ps. Nice work on all of the JIRA resolutions you and Mathias have been > providing lately. > > > On 7/25/05, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You could try to add an own prefix to the image created dynamically so > > writeIdIfNecessary does render the id, couldn't you? > > > > Bruno > > > > 2005/7/25, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Its definitely the writeIdIfNecessary (I was just looking up the svn > > > blame to find the culprit when I read your message.) > > > > > > I can see why in *most* cases we don't want to render an id unless one > > > was explicitly provided. In the tree2 case though we are creating > > > components dynamically and they need ids that can be refrenced via > > > javascript. > > > > > > sean > > > > > > On 7/25/05, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I am the one who provided the patch to extend the graphicImage > > > > component. As far as I recall I only put in HtmlImageRendererBase the > > > > code that was in the HtmlImageRenderer class. So I am not sure what is > > > > happening now. Maybe an issue with > > > > HtmlRendererUtils.writeIdIfNecessary.... > > > > > > > > Bruno > > > > > > > > 2005/7/25, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > I noticed that UIGraphic components are no longer having their id's > > > > > rendered in the HTML. This is causing a problem with Tree2. Martin, > > > > > can you shed some light on the changes you made to this class? Is > > > > > writing the id a problem with the spec or is it something that > > > > > accidentally got lost? > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > sean > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
