It was intended to include the TLD doc stuff as well. For the specific question of what attributes go on what tags, the TLD itself is the authoritative definition of those decisions.
Which also leads back to a question raised yesterday (about just copying the javadoc comments into the MyFaces API classes). This stuff, by being incorporated into the spec, means that its covered by the spec license ... so you can't just reproduce it. Craig On 7/25/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes but does this include the TLD javadoc? I'm assuming it does. If > so we have a bunch of issues to address. > > sean > > On 7/25/05, Abrams, Howard A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From the 1.1 spec: > > > > "The class and method Javadoc documentation for the classes and > > interfaces in > > javax.faces (and its subpackages) are incorporated by reference as > > requirements > > of this Specification." > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 3:07 PM > > > To: MyFaces Development > > > Subject: JSF Spec Question > > > > > > The specfication doesn't seem to list the attributes for the various > > > tags that are part of the spec. I seemed to recall hearing Craig > > > mention that the RI javadoc is also considered part of the spec? Is > > > that true? If there is an attribute in the MyFaces impl that is not > > > in the javadoc > > (http://java.sun.com/j2ee/javaserverfaces/1.1_01/docs/tlddocs/index.html > > ) > > > are we in violation of the spec? > > > > > > sean > > > > > > > > > >
