'sbx' is exactly what i was thinking about. In english 'ts' has a
certain meaning though ('tough shit') which is a unsympathetic way to
say 'If you don't like it too bad for you.' ;-)
sean
On 8/2/05, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 0.5
> After all that time using the 'x', changing to 't' is a big change as
> we all have got used to 'x'. The massive replace is needed, and
> existing production applications could change progressively from 'x'
> to 't' as the prefix is defined in each page. I do agree that it is
> more natural to use the 't' now that the components+extensions
> subproject it is called tomahawk and for new users the 't' might be
> more understandable than an x. Also, what Dennis points out has been
> said some times in the past and it is not the first time the 'x'
> debate is started....
> Maybe for the sandbox we could use a 2 or 3-letter prefix, such as
> 'sx' (then the 'x' would have more sense for the Xtensions) or 'sbx'.
> Or maybe 'ts' (tomahawk sandbox)...
>
> Regards,
>
> Bruno
>
> 2005/8/2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > From a user's perspective, I felt slightly jilted by the 'x' because that is
> > what I and everyone else have always used for the JSTL XML taglib - which is
> > pretty popular, and to my knowledge, "claimed it" first.
> >
> > Dennis Byrne
> >
>
