How about two TLD files (like we had for SF): the original one will
have the extensions URI and have 'x'.  The new one will have tomahawk
and 't'.  Sound good?


On 8/3/05, Thomas Spiegl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 also for renaming the uri - should be enough if it's mentioned in the
> release notes - let's not do things by halves
> 
> 
> On 8/3/05, Matthias Wessendorf < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > well we could provide the old an the new tld... ;) 
> > 
> > like we did in the past (sf -> a.o)
> > 
> > -Matthias
> > 
> > On 8/3/05, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > another (reluctant) +1 
> > >
> > >  cause all users have to change their JSP-files with that, just changing
> the
> > > prefix doesn't do any harm.
> > >
> > >  regards,
> > >
> > >  Martin
> > >
> > >
> > > On 8/3/05, Sean Schofield < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > +1 for Matthias' suggestion as well
> > > >
> > > > On 8/3/05, Bruno Aranda < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > +1 to the 'also' :-) I think we should change to tomahawk wherever
> it
> > > > > is needed...
> > > > >
> > > > > Bruno
> > > > >
> > > > > 2005/8/3, Matthias Wessendorf < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > > > also
> > > > > >
> > > > > > <uri> http://myfaces.apache.org/extensions </uri>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > to
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 8/3/05, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > +1 
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 8/2/05, Sean Schofield < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > I was thinking that also.  +1 
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 8/2/05, Bruno Aranda < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Now that we are adjusting names to tomahawk, should'nt also
> the 
> > > > > > > > > myfaces_ext.tld file change to tomahawk.tld?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Bruno 
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf 
> > 
> 
>

Reply via email to