Yes I remember, what licensing were you looking for Facelets? If you've
been following the licensing threads related to CDDL, the issue isn't
CDDL, it's Sun's contribution and copyright assignment-- which Facelets
is NOT under.
Is there something in particular that you are looking for from the license?
-- Jacob
Martin Marinschek wrote:
Hi Jacob,
I suspect that it might be the license issue - you remember, we
discussed that?
regards,
Martin
On 8/9/05, *Matthias Wessendorf* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
FYI
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jacob Hookom <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
Date: Aug 9, 2005 3:07 PM
Subject: Shale Tapestry Integration
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Gary,
I'm wondering why Shale doesn't just look at using Facelets
instead of
trying to integrate a parser from a completely different
framework? It
is already JSF-centric with more templating features than
Tapestry. On
top of that, Facelets uses the new EL API to properly handle EL
variable
management-- better than the next version of JSP (2.1) for tree
creation.
Home Page:
https://facelets.dev.java.net/
Documentation:
https://facelets.dev.java.net/nonav/docs/dev/docbook.html
Sample Error Page:
https://facelets.dev.java.net/nonav/docs/dev/error.html
Cheers,
Jacob
--
Matthias Wessendorf
--
Jacob Hookom - Minneapolis
--------------------------
http://hookom.blogspot.com
