Thanks. I'll start to look at how to provide the plug points as soon as I can (which might mean a few days from now).
Stan Silvert JBoss, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] callto://stansilvert > -----Original Message----- > From: Shinsuke SUGAYA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 6:17 PM > To: MyFaces Development > Subject: Re: build order for MyFaces Portlet > > Stan Silvert wrote: > > Go ahead and enter the feature request in jira. We can discuss/capture > > the details there. > > Filed MYFACES-434, and attached the patch. > As described in it, for the patch, tomahawk depends on impl. > So, it needs your suggestion. > > Regards, > shinsuke > > > Stan Silvert > > JBoss, Inc. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > callto://stansilvert > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Shinsuke SUGAYA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 6:17 PM > >>To: MyFaces Development > >>Subject: Re: build order for MyFaces Portlet > >> > >>Stan Silvert wrote: > >> > >>>What is there now should be fine. MyFacesGenericPortlet belongs > > > > with > > > >>>impl. It is no different from MyFacesServlet in that regard. > >>> > >>>The problem is that the JSF spec never got around to defining > > > > JSFPortlet > > > >>>the way they did FacesServlet. They defined the functionality, but > > > > not > > > >>>name of the Portlet. I'll try to see that this is addressed in JSF > > > > 2.0 > > > >>>if I am still on the EG next time around. > >> > >>Good! I agree with you. > >> > >> > >>>In the mean time, I think the solution is to use delegation instead > > > > of > > > >>>inheritance. I will change the MyFacesGenericPortlet to define plug > >>>points. Then tomahawk can contain the needed plugins without > > > > extending > > > >>>MyFacesGenericPortlet. Then there will be no dependency. > >>> > >>>Come to think of it, that is probably a cleaner solution anyway. I > > > > hate > > > >>>inheritance. > >>> > >>>Do you follow me Shinsuke? > >> > >>Yes. > >>I would like to know more details to update my suggestion :) > >> > >>Regards, > >> shinsuke > >> > >> > >>>Stan Silvert > >>>JBoss, Inc. > >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>callto://stansilvert > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>-----Original Message----- > >>>>From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 5:39 PM > >>>>To: MyFaces Development > >>>>Subject: Re: build order for MyFaces Portlet > >>>> > >>>>Tomahawk should work with either the RI or MyFaces. So if there is > > > > a > > > >>>>dependency in the portlet stuff on MyFaces impl that needs to be > > > > added > > > >>>>to JIRA and then fixed. I haven't been following the portlet stuff > >>>>but if its possible to move something our of impl and into the > > > > "share" > > > >>>>subproject, that might be a solution. > >>>> > >>>>sean > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>It is OK for tomahawk to reference the base impl, but it is not OK > >>> > >>>for > >>> > >>> > >>>>>>impl to reference tomahawk. > >>>>> > >>>>>I just reread my post and realized that the above may not be > >>> > >>>correct. > >>> > >>> > >>>>>It might be that tomahawk can only reference the JSF API and not > >>> > >>>impl. > >>> > >>> > >>>>>Hmm. Now I think I see your dilemma. > >>>>> > >>>>>Can anyone give an authoritative answer about tomahawk? > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>Stan > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>Regards, > >>>>>>> shinsuke > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>Stan Silvert > >>>>>>>>JBoss, Inc. > >>>>>>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>>>>callto://stansilvert > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>-----Original Message----- > >>>>>>>>>From: Shinsuke SUGAYA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>>>>>Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 9:48 AM > >>>>>>>>>To: Stan Silvert > >>>>>>>>>Subject: build order for MyFaces Portlet > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>Hi Stan, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>I'm working on MyFaces' portlet. > >>>>>>>>>For build order, I encountered the issue. > >>>>>>>>>I would like to use AddResource in impl/ directory, but > >>>>>>>>>AddResource class is in tomahawk. Therefore, I could not > >>>>>>>>>build impl jar... Do you have any idea? My suggestion is > >>>>>>>>>to create a new directory(ex. portlet) and move files for > >>>>>>>>>the portlet. So, myfaces-portlet.jar is created. What do > >>>>>>>>>you think? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>Regards, > >>>>>>>>>shinsuke > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>__________________________________ > >>>>>>>>>Save the earth > >>>>>>>>>http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/ondanka/ > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>__________________________________ > >>>>>>>Save the earth > >>>>>>>http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/ondanka/ > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>__________________________________ > >>Save the earth > >>http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/ondanka/ > > > > > > > > __________________________________ > Save the earth > http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/ondanka/
