Yes, now I understand, Thanks! Bruno
2005/9/7, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Its a little confusing. Back when we decided to make a 1.0.10 branch > I changed the JIRA issue. Then I changed "Nightly" version to > "1.0.10m10" and added a *new* "Nightly" version. This is a JIRA short > cut that doesn't require a manual fix of everything that was closed > out as nightly (which should now read 1.0.10.) > > Since there was a lot of JSF 1.1 compat stuff being fixed on the > trunk, the idea was that those were to be fixed in "nightly" and not > 1.0.10 since the 1.0.10 code was more or less frozen. > > I'm currently thinking we should put some of the recent changes into > 1.0.10 so here's my plan (see also earlier email.): > > Create new 1.0.10 branch (with everything from HEAD) up until today. > Any JIRA issues that were closed as "Nightly" over the past week > change to "1.0.10m10" (unfortunately this has to be done manually.) > Any issues *reported* against 1.0.10 should be changed to nightly. > Any issues closed after today should be marked *fixed* in nightly. > > Make sense? > > sean > > On 9/7/05, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What has happened to JIRA? Most of the bugs now say that the affected > > version is the 10.0.m10... > > >
