Yup that's the one. sean
On 9/7/05, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You're probably thinking of the message I forwarded to the myfaces dev > list earlier about JSF 1.2 requiring 5.0 > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Ed Burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Aug 15, 2005 12:20 PM > Subject: [NOTICE] Need Java SE 5.0 to build JSF now > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Hello, > > AS per EG discussion, I have modified jsf-api to introduce generics. > This means Java SE 5.0 is now required in order to build JSF. > > Ed > > On 9/7/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I seem to recall that as well ... I know its in some new spec I was > > reading. Couldn't remember if it was JSF 1.2 or not ... > > > > sean > > > > On 9/7/05, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I think once JSF 1.2 is on the table, the swtich to 5.0 will be enforced > > > Sun to my knowledge has switched in 1.2 for the RI... > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > > Jesse Alexander (KBSA 21) wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > Because it makes things more complicated. We've got enough on our > > > > plate now. At some point when J2SE 5.0 becomes the standard we will > > > > switch to it. > > > > -----/Original Message----- > > > > the question is WHEN is a new JDK standard? > > > > I know enterprises (and some of them big companies) that are just now > > > > desperately trying to get rid of the last web-applications that > > > > run on JDK 1.1 > > > > > > > > I think one needs to calculate at least 2 years after GA of the usual > > > > app-servers (servlet-engines) that use the new JDK to have at least 80% > > > > of the companies to have switched to the new system... > > > > > > > > regards > > > > Alexander > > > > > > > > > > > > >
