+1 Sean Schofield wrote:
>So are we ok to build a release candidate now? If so, I will try and >get one up this weekend. > >sean > >On 9/8/05, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>+1 >> >>2005/9/8, Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> >>>+1 >>>On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 13:26 -0400, Abrams, Howard A wrote: >>> >>> >>>>+1 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>>From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 10:24 AM >>>>>To: MyFaces Development >>>>>Subject: Release decisions >>>>> >>>>>I just fixed an important stumbling block in the build script so now >>>>>it should be possible to build a release *without* the sandbox stuff >>>>>(and without the build crashing.) There have been a lot of changes to >>>>>the HEAD during the past week, so I'm not sure how we should proceed. >>>>> >>>>>My thinking is that we should rebuild the 1_0_10 tag/branch with the >>>>>newest code and just heavily test. I think there is too much stuff in >>>>>the HEAD that we would want. But at some point we need to freeze the >>>>>1.0.10 code. >>>>> >>>>>So I propose that I make a new 1.0.10 branch off the latest code and >>>>>that we use that to build a release candidate. Only the most >>>>>important bugs (such as missing stuff from the release bundle) would >>>>>then be addressed in 1.0.10. Last minute requests for fixing specific >>>>>bugs will be fixed on the trunk but they won't go into 1.0.10. >>>>> >>>>>Can I get a few +1's on that? >>>>> >>>>>sean >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>-- >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- Oliver Rossmueller Software Engineer and IT-Consultant Hamburg, Germany http://www.rossmueller.com
