We just need the corrected build.xml put into the 1_1_0 tag. The build should *only* contain the changes necessary for faces-config.xml (not the new unit testing stuff, etc.) Do we have volunteers to test once its built?
sean On 9/23/05, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, Bill, > > can you take over here? > > You tried this before? > > regards, > > Martin > > On 9/23/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sigh. How did we miss this one? I thought we did a test of > > everything? This is probably the only type of error where we could > > justify doing this although its kind of embarassing that it happened > > in the first place. > > > > Technically you can check into a tagged version so this is probably > > the best thing to do. Let me know when its done (and tested) and I > > can do a rebuild and re-publish of the myfaces binary bundles over the > > weekend. > > > > sean > > > > On 9/23/05, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > We have been discussing doing a release as the problem with the > > > faces-config.xml missing in the myfaces-all.jar is a very prominent > > > one ;) > > > > > > If there is a way of fixing the existing release with just the > > > faces-config.xml file, that would be better! > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > Martin > > > > > > On 9/23/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > as long as 1_1_0 is ok to change (by convention tags are not > > > > > modified, only branches). > > > > > > > > Technically you can change it but SVN (at least Tortoise SVN) warns > > > > you and says its a tag and you shouldn't. Why do we need a branch at > > > > this point? > > > > > > > > We could create a branch for it but lets establish why this is > > > > necessary first. > > > > > > > > > > > > > All I'm looking for is a place to change the release only enough to > > > > > get the faces-config.xml file in place (as well as the other missing > > > > > bits because that file is not found) and then get a new release > > > > > pushed out. > > > > > > > > > > Martin M is planning on doing another release from the trunk after I > > > > > finish my commit. That is fine but risky. > > > > > > > > We're doing a release? I haven't read every message on the dev list > > > > but I must have missed this discussion. What is the motivation for > > > > this? > > > > > > > > > TTFN, > > > > > > > > > > -bd- > > > > > > > > sean > > > > > > > > > On Sep 23, 2005, at 5:53 AM, Sean Schofield wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > -1 > > > > > > > > > > > > Note that after I tagged the 1.1 release I created a external in the > > > > > > "release" dir so if you use > > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/release/1_1_0/ you will get > > > > > > "current" but for the release. It doesn't include sandbox so its > > > > > > not > > > > > > quite the same but sandbox is not part of the official release. > > > > > > > > > > > > Doesn't this give you what you need? > > > > > > > > > > > > sean > > > > > > > > > > > > On 9/23/05, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> I agree with Martin on this - if you need everything, you can > > > > > >> always > > > > > >> checkout MyFaces, right? > > > > > >> > > > > > >> regards, > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Martin > > > > > >> > > > > > >> On 9/23/05, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> On Thu, 22 Sep 2005, Bill Dudney wrote: > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>> Well the idea is that people would then be using current/trunk > > > > > >>>> to checkout > > > > > >>>> instead of just current. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> But by definition, what's in branches and tags is not current, so > > > > > >>> why does > > > > > >>> it make sense to include them under 'current'? The structure you > > > > > >>> described > > > > > >>> is exactly what you have without using the 'current' external in > > > > > >>> the first > > > > > >>> place, isn't it? > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> -- > > > > > >>> Martin Cooper > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>> TTFN, > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> -bd- > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> On Sep 22, 2005, at 12:31 PM, Martin Cooper wrote: > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> On Thu, 22 Sep 2005, Bill Dudney wrote: > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> Hi All, > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> I'd like to propose that we change current to be; > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> current > > > > > >>>>>> /branches > > > > > >>>>>> /tags > > > > > >>>>>> /trunk > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> Still all externals but tracking the group of tags & branches > > > > > >>>>>> that are > > > > > >>>>>> common across all the subprojects. > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> current/trunk -> becomes what we currently call current > > > > > >>>>>> current/branches -> currently empty > > > > > >>>>>> current/tags -> 1_1_0 with externals to each subproject's > > > > > >>>>>> 1_1_0 tag > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> I would recommend against doing that. It would mean that > > > > > >>>>> everyone checking > > > > > >>>>> out 'current' would end up with multiple copies of the entire > > > > > >>>>> source tree, > > > > > >>>>> which is unlikely to be something that they would want. > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> Most people are unlikely to want more than one version of the > > > > > >>>>> source at any > > > > > >>>>> given time, so I don't see a need to clump together multiple > > > > > >>>>> versions in a > > > > > >>>>> single checkout. > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> -- > > > > > >>>>> Martin Cooper > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> To fix the faces-config.xml bug that's been identified in the > > > > > >>>>>> 1_1_0 > > > > > >>>>>> release we can create a branch in current/branches/1_1_0 that > > > > > >>>>>> uses > > > > > >>>>>> externals to the tags for everything but 'build' which would > > > > > >>>>>> point to the > > > > > >>>>>> 1_1_0 branch in build (not yet created but I'd be glad to do > > > > > >>>>>> that). > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> Thoughts? > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> TTFN, > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> -bd- > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> -- > > > > > >> > > > > > >> http://www.irian.at > > > > > >> Your JSF powerhouse - > > > > > >> JSF Trainings in English and German > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > http://www.irian.at > > > Your JSF powerhouse - > > > JSF Trainings in English and German > > > > > > > > -- > > http://www.irian.at > Your JSF powerhouse - > JSF Trainings in English and German >
