You mean put a RC up? I'm working on that. Right now I am fixing the build along the lines of the proposal that we discussed (simplifying sandbox stuff.) I am testing it as we speak but as with most Ant builds, I am sure it will take a few iterrations ;-)
sean On 9/23/05, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The branch is based on the tag. > > Sean could you push a release? > > TTFN, > > -bd- > > On Sep 23, 2005, at 12:28 PM, Sean Schofield wrote: > > > I will start on the change that I proposed in the other thread. We > > can always roll it back if there are a lot of -1. > > > > Also, I asked this is the other thread but I should've asked you here, > > did you branch off the 1.1.0 tag or latest trunk? > > > > It matters because the fix is in the trunk already and we'll have a > > conflict. No big deal but we just need to be on the same page. > > > > sean > > > > > > > > On 9/23/05, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Totally agree that we should not shoot ourselves in the foot again. > >> > >> The branches are complete and I have a fix in place on the branch. > >> > >> I added a tags and branches directory to the release dir > >> > >> release/ > >> tags/ > >> 1_1_0 <- is what we released > >> branches/ > >> 1_1_0 <- is what I've fixed and and we will build our > >> release from > >> > >> Once we are sure that we have a good build we can create a new tag > >> > >> release/tags/1_1_0_1 > >> > >> I've run the simple app with the 3 constituent jar files and myfaces- > >> all and what I've tested is working. > >> > >> TTFN, > >> > >> TTFN, > >> > >> -bd- > >> > >> On Sep 23, 2005, at 11:24 AM, Sean Schofield wrote: > >> > >> > >>> OK just found this thread from yesterday afternoon. Man if you > >>> leave > >>> your computer for a few hours I guess you miss a lot of action! > >>> > >>> We definitely should run the TCK before releasing and we should test > >>> everything (for real this time) and vote. This wil take about a > >>> week > >>> but we rushed things last time and look what it got us into ... > >>> > >>> I agree the problem is urgent but somehow we managed to shoot > >>> ourselves in the foot again with the release. This time it was > >>> announcing the TCK passage before we had a release candidate. This > >>> created the sense of urgency to get the new release out and > >>> apprarently we did not test things very thoroughly. > >>> > >>> In the meantime we could put something on the website explaining > >>> that > >>> myfaces-all.jar doesn't work and to use impl, api and tomahawk > >>> instead > >>> for now. We can also promise an upcoming release soon. Perhaps we > >>> could do a release candidate later today once Bill is finished with > >>> the branch and fixes. > >>> > >>> sean > >>> > >>> On 9/23/05, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> checked into the trunk > >>>> > >>>> Thanks Martin! > >>>> > >>>> -bd- > >>>> On Sep 23, 2005, at 6:16 AM, Martin Marinschek wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> You are right - no question. > >>>>> > >>>>> we should definitely rerun the TCK if possible. > >>>>> > >>>>> Oliver is on holidays, remains Manfred to do so... > >>>>> > >>>>> Manfred? > >>>>> > >>>>> ;) > >>>>> > >>>>> regards, > >>>>> > >>>>> Martin > >>>>> > >>>>> On 9/23/05, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> Hi All, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> This is the essence of what I fixed. I've rebuilt and used the > >>>>>> myfaces-all.jar in the the 'simple.war' test application and > >>>>>> everything I tested worked. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Instead of 'dist-all' use 'release'. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The only problem I see with this approach is that we could > >>>>>> introduce > >>>>>> unintended consequences by releasing from the trunk (see my > >>>>>> response > >>>>>> to Sean just moments ago). We can't be 100% sure that no one has > >>>>>> committed a TCK breaking change since the release went out so in > >>>>>> theory we should rerun the tests before pushing out a new > >>>>>> release. If > >>>>>> we make the change in a branch then we can more easily assert > >>>>>> that > >>>>>> nothing has changed except the build file. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> My $0.02 worth and I'm not against a release from the trunk its > >>>>>> just > >>>>>> another level of risk. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> TTFN, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -bd- > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Theoretically we should be doing a patch to the release branch > >>>>>> and > >>>>>> releasing from there (with the -Dskip.sandbox=true that Bruno > >>>>>> mentions). > >>>>>> On Sep 23, 2005, at 5:57 AM, Bruno Aranda wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Remember to release without the sandbox. In theory you should > >>>>>>> use > >>>>>>> 'ant > >>>>>>> -Dskip.sandbox=true dist-all', but that is the origin of the > >>>>>>> bug. I > >>>>>>> cannot look at it right now... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Bruno > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> 2005/9/23, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Bill, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> please go ahead and check in what you have got now. If you > >>>>>>>> do it > >>>>>>>> anytime during the next hour, I will go ahead and prepare a new > >>>>>>>> release from this so that we get this faces-config problem out > >>>>>>>> of the > >>>>>>>> world as fast as possible! > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> regards, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Martin > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 9/22/05, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I have a lot of other changes related to the cactus/cargo > >>>>>>>>> stuff. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I don't have a problem checking in all that but there has not > >>>>>>>>> been > >>>>>>>>> much discussion about it yet. I'd rather see some discussion > >>>>>>>>> happen > >>>>>>>>> before I check in the rest of the changes. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> TTFN, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> -bd- > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Sep 22, 2005, at 1:38 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> It's got to be checked into the trunk at some point. I don't > >>>>>>>>>> see any > >>>>>>>>>> advantages in waiting. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On 9/22/05, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> OTOH, I could checkin everything including the cactus & > >>>>>>>>>>> cargo > >>>>>>>>>>> changes > >>>>>>>>>>> and that would fix things on the trunk. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts? > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> -bd- > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 22, 2005, at 1:25 PM, Bill Dudney wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> No I've not checked it in yet because I'm waiting for > >>>>>>>>>>>> discussion on > >>>>>>>>>>>> the idea of making a 1_1_0 branch that we could do the > >>>>>>>>>>>> emergency > >>>>>>>>>>>> release from. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> TTNF, > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> -bd- > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 22, 2005, at 1:20 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Is this supposed to be fixed in svn? > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I just did a complete checkout about an hour ago, and > >>>>>>>>>>>>> built > >>>>>>>>>>>>> it with > >>>>>>>>>>>>> "ant dist-all" and I'm getting the error below if I use > >>>>>>>>>>>>> myfaces- > >>>>>>>>>>>>> all, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> but not if I use myfaces.api, myfaces.impl, and tomahawk > >>>>>>>>>>>>> separately. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/myfaces/config/ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> FacesConfigurator > >>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.myfaces.webapp.StartupServletContextListener.in > >>>>>>>>>>>>> it > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fa > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ce > >>>>>>>>>>>>> s > >>>>>>>>>>>>> (StartupServletContextListener.java:63) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.myfaces.webapp.StartupServletContextListener.co > >>>>>>>>>>>>> nt > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ex > >>>>>>>>>>>>> tI > >>>>>>>>>>>>> nit > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ia > >>>>>>>>>>>>> lized(StartupServletContextListener.java:46) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Or is this a case of the cure being worse than the > >>>>>>>>>>>>> disease? > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -Mike > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/22/05, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since this is simply a build problem perhaps we could > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> copy > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the tag > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1_1_0 to a branch and update only the build.xml file then > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> build a > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> new > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> release. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> This would be simple, quick and more or less safe. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would we have to rerun the TCK? As long as we trust our > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tag it > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> should > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> be fine. Correct? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> TTFN, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -bd- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 22, 2005, at 12:08 PM, Werner Punz wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bruno Aranda wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is causing many troubles to users now as we can > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> questions in the list. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> faces-config.xml is not included in the build > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because of > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MYFACES-598, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when passing -Dskip.sandbox to the build process the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> included. I think this is important enough and we > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should do > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about this. I don't know if it is possible to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current release but I don't think it is good to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> development to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> touch > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an already released thing. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My opinion here is that we should release a maintenance > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.1.1 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as soon as possible. Waiting for thoughts on this. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bruno > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I cannot vote yet, but due to the fact that many newbys > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> probably > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will try to use the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new release, due to the non beta status and TCK status, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and this > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is really a showstopper for many, I�d say get the fix > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> out ASAP! > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> http://www.irian.at > >>>>>>>> Your JSF powerhouse - > >>>>>>>> JSF Trainings in English and German > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> > >>>>> http://www.irian.at > >>>>> Your JSF powerhouse - > >>>>> JSF Trainings in English and German > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
