I like this approach too. sandbox.jar is separate but part of the
release.
I'm equally OK with putting the sandbox stuff into the myfaces-
all.jar with a separate tld (i.e. don't do the 'all' tld). Users wont
be confused because its in a separate tld.
I don't agree that its a lazy/not lazy thing, its just simpler to
have one jar file with the whole thing instead of multiple.
TTFN,
-bd-
On Sep 26, 2005, at 11:57 AM, Sean Schofield wrote:
Issue 2: making an exception for sandbox in the build:
@Sean: Still, I think we shouldn't make an exception to the build for
the sandbox.jar when releasing - I'd say we just release it as well,
clearly indicating that this is experimental stuff.
I might be persuaded to accept this route. It would certainly be
easier (we wouldn't have to worry about skipping the sandbox.)
So we would get rid of myfaces all TLD and *not* include sandbox in
myfaces-all.jar right? Everything would be in sandbox.jar and thar
jar would be available in both the nightly and release builds?
Is that what you are proposing?
sean
